depth of field

[sarrasani]

bye all!:)
Sandro

[tomorrowstreasures]

Neat! clever title too!

[Marko]

Love the light here, nice and bright.

[Iguanasan]

Wonderful image and a clever title. I like it! :D

[sarrasani]

Thank you much, and thank you to Iguanasan and Marko.
Really happy you liked it.
Bye,
Sandro

[Bambi]

yes, it's a very clever title. Even more important its a beautiful image. I love the detail in the grass and how it leads to the horizon. the sky is stunning too. :1st:
Great work Sarrasani!

[sarrasani]

So kind! Thank you Bambi.

[Mad Aussie]

I agree ... clever title and shot. Huge DOF. Was it multiple images with different focal points? Or did you work out your hyperfocal distance for it?

[JAS_Photo]

Very cool!

[sarrasani]

Thank you raiven and Mad Aussie. Only one shot, with diaphragm at 16
it's an HDR elaboration. Difficult to control and to avoid artifacts and "strange" solutions, but there is a real expansion of dynamics, and the image (from a dynamic point of view) is more similar to reality. When there are shadows and lights I'm not happy of the dynamic resolution of actual cameras (I don't known the power of MF recent backs, I use a good Full Frame camera with good dynamic in its category , about 11 stops, but human eye capture 24 stops....), and these simple hdr softwares helps to extract more detail from shadows without burning the lights.
I use Photomatix, and I know other 2-3 ones.
Bye,
Sandro.

[Fortytwo]

You were telling the truth, there's a lot depth of field. Really nice work! :)