Do you think this photo requires more punch. It is rendered quite realistically as far as I can remember, so does it work?
This is a discussion on Wood Bridge within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Do you think this photo requires more punch. It is rendered quite realistically as far as I can remember, so ...
Looks good to me. Only that background steals the show..What Bridge? Its hardly a fair fight
Me on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/mtb_antz
Beautiful scene. I disagree with Antz--the bridge works in tandem with the mountains for me, and my eye goes to it. On my nice Mac monitor, the bottom half of the shot appears a bit dark--perhaps the mid-tones need to be lifted a bit?
Canon 40D, 10-22/3.5-4.5, 17-55/2.8 IS, 70-200/4L, 60/2.8 Macro, 85/1.8, 1.4x II Extender, Lensbaby Composer
"I take photographs to see what the thing looks like photographed." -Gary Winogrand
I like it! I wish I could of been there..just gorgeous!
I too find it a tad bit dark (underexposed) or flat maybe. I'm not to sure but it has a little bit of a dull appearance.
My new blog as of Nov/10
http://katchickloski.wordpress.com/
My just a tad more contrast or possibly bring up the blacks a bit.
It is a well done image as is though
www.steelcityphotography.com
My mistake has been seeking new landscapes. I should have been seeking new light.
Yes! It is gorgeous now.
What a cool scene indeed. I think the 2nd shot is a tad overdone now but it certainly did wonders for the sky and mountain in the background.
Better, but I agree a tad overdone now. Have you experimented with some fill light in the bottom half? Still, a beautiful shot.
Canon 40D, 10-22/3.5-4.5, 17-55/2.8 IS, 70-200/4L, 60/2.8 Macro, 85/1.8, 1.4x II Extender, Lensbaby Composer
"I take photographs to see what the thing looks like photographed." -Gary Winogrand
Bookmarks