I like shot 1 but it looks a bit soft.
I prefer shot 2. It could use some slight leveling as the shot slopes to the right though. Hope that helps - Marko
This is a discussion on Old house within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Hi everyone! The old house is just that, the magazine was taken at Ft. Worden....
To remove this advertisement, join our community
By Joining our community you will gain access to the following, totally free, features:
Hi everyone!
The old house is just that, the magazine was taken at Ft. Worden.
I like shot 1 but it looks a bit soft.
I prefer shot 2. It could use some slight leveling as the shot slopes to the right though. Hope that helps - Marko
- Please connect with me further
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
- Check out some newer/older work at markokulik.com
- I try to post in many threads each day; PM me if I've missed yours and you want me to take a look.
Yer I think Marko's on the money, Shot1 is a little soft and Shot two with a little bit of levelling is good.
I'm not to keen on shot one, I find the overgrown stuff at the front of the house a bit distracting, maybe pulling back a bit might work?
while I agree that shot 1 is soft you might be able to fix by applying some PP, not to make it sharper but to make the softness work. I'm thinking like a sepia colour or something like that.
I really like shot 2. Love the repeating pattern and the texture of the walls.
Feel free to make comments on any of my shots
my blog: http://bambesblog.blogspot.com/
My flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bambe1964/
A painter takes their vision and makes it a reality. A photographer takes reality and makes it their vision.
Shot 1, I think, has a lot of promise. It is too soft, for my liking and I think that being a couple feet higher would have not only got the camera above the brush, but also would have provided a more intimate perspective on the house, by being closer and focusing less on it's environment. The house itself would convey a sense of decay and impermanence. I assume that's what you're looking for. Are you able to redo it (if you want to)?
Shot 2 might benefit from having a person walking at the back. That might be a wholly different picture, though.
It's all been said so I am chiming in late.
Too many distractions in the first one. I like the second one but I would go back and reshoot. This location with the right lighting has a LOT of potential.
What's PP? Post-production?
I agree that shot 1 could use a little work. It could be cropped a little to remove distractions (top and maybe left side), or the colors could be sepia or black and white.
Shot 2 is really nice. It looks almost like a painting. The highlight on the wall to the right of the door is a bit too bright, it might look better if dodged a bit. Reducing distortion to make everything straight could help, but maybe you could go the other way with more distortion too.
Maybe a touch of fill flash and something to add interest to the foreground would work too. My 2 cents.
I really like the 2nd one.
Bookmarks