In situations like wedding, wouldn't a softbox be cumbersome to work with? What about on camera diffuser? Will it work in these situations?
This is a discussion on Wedding photography trial within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Originally Posted by Marko This is EXCELLENT iggy and totally describes what i was going for And yup, you should ...
To remove this advertisement, join our community
By Joining our community you will gain access to the following, totally free, features:
In situations like wedding, wouldn't a softbox be cumbersome to work with? What about on camera diffuser? Will it work in these situations?
Unless you are doing the formals...the softbox is indeed too cumbersome imo.
I highly recommend, NOT getting into these accessories, and NOT taking the flash off camera until you have fully mastered what direct on-camera flash is capable of (the basics). Adding additional variables when the basics are not mastered will only introduce additional confusion imo.
Offering your services as an assistant wedding photographer, for FREE, for few weddings is also HIGHLY recommended.
I have shot many weddings in my time, and i was an assistant for at least 1 year before attempting my own weddings.
- Please connect with me further
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
- I try to post in many threads each day; PM me if I've missed yours and you want me to take a look.
~~ Rule of thirds is for whimps ~~I chew coffee beans with my teeth while gargling with 67° water to enjoy coffee. What is this "coffee brewing" device you speak of?
Thanks Marko and Matt K.
I think working as a wedding photographer is too much work. I have to try first shooting in less hectic scenarios like meetings first.
Bookmarks