<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quality of Lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.photography.ca/blog/2009/06/08/quality-of-lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.photography.ca/blog/2009/06/08/quality-of-lenses/</link>
	<description>Photography podcast blog and forum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 21:08:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Wilson</title>
		<link>https://www.photography.ca/blog/2009/06/08/quality-of-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-192038</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photography.ca/blog/?p=398#comment-192038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew kinda mentioned it in the forum, but it bears repeating:  Depending on your shooting style, the bokeh can also be an important quality of the lens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew kinda mentioned it in the forum, but it bears repeating:  Depending on your shooting style, the bokeh can also be an important quality of the lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
