................
Printable View
................
Well here is a very quick, non HDR job of a moon shot with a foreground.
The moon was shot with an equivalent 35mm format of 135mm which looks realistic in size.
Tegan
http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/b...falls_lune.jpg
I too have seen plenty of bad HDRs - but I have seen some amazing HDRs as well.
In terms of whether it would work with the moon shot, I was thinking about that yesterday evening before I read tegan's 'no it would not work' post. I too was thinking that maybe the range is too great. Maybe.
But tegan's sweeping statement (especially since he doesn't do HDR), for me is a challenge...and so I will try it. He may be right but I'm not convinced he's right. And if it does work there will be more detail throughout the photo.
More details and an HDR podcast to follow...:)
Thx
Marko
My sweeping statements are somewhat "tongue firmly planted in cheek" :) so I am glad you did take up the challenge. The range however is so great that you are really only doing my collage approach in a slightly different manner. There is no real tonal benefit to the HDR approach for this type of shot, so why take that approach?Quote:
Originally Posted by marko
Tegan
I totally agree with everything you have said.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michaelaw
Tegan
So, Marko, when can I expect to see your HDR moon shot experiment?
I provided my quick rendition.
Tegan