Printable View
Um, hard to say how many in a month. It really depends on how much time I have/am procrastinating. But I usually get ~80 for every half hour ish I'm taking pictures. If I'm indoors and taking pictures of my nephews/nieces, then the numbers are waaaay lower cause the flash really annoys me.
Uhh, that's something you'd have to ask your wife. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueX
As many as I need and/or feel like.
You must work for tech support. A perfectly accurate answer that tells me absolutely nothing. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by AcadieLibre
My intention was not to force you to take only a certain number of shots, I'm just trying to understand if taking more shots makes you better. Obviously, more practice makes you better, but where's the threshold? Am I doing fine at a couple hundred a month or do I need to step up my game to get better?
The numbers are irrelevant really, it's the experience, and the success and the process that counts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iguanasan
It's probably better to only take ten really carefully considered shots a month than 3000 random bad snapshots - you'd probably learn more with the former than the latter.
Research. Look. Try. Experiment. Play. Think. Inspire. Shoot. Strive to be better.
And do it regularly.
That's the key, not just the numbers.
To me it is just irrelevant, has no meaning one way or another, I see no significance in raw photo counts but what percentage of what I am shooting is good. I think digital spoils people, when you grew up shooting film, getting 72 shots in an outing was a good raw count and now people shoot 300 - 400 photos in and outing, so your bound to get a least one OK photo. I go out and if I shoot 80 - 90 photos in an outing for lets call it fine art photography to me that is a high count. When I went digital I was shooting those high amounts and I realized I was going about the wrong way, it is what I end up that is quality and not quantity. I went back to shooting like when I shot film, I shoot low numbers and end up with far better shots because I don't push the trigger until the shot is framed and my exposure is what I want for the shot and I am not just taking whack at it, each and every photo is thought out and planned before I pull that trigger. Shooting live bands is another matter, but even with that my total of shots to what is usable is very high. Anyone can fire off 3,000 photos a month and get a good one, a Photographer can fire off 72 a month and several great photos.
Ok. So you are telling me what I think I've already figured out. My current problem is that I actually need to slow down for each shot. Take more time to compose the shot making mental note of why I'm making the choices I'm making. The more often I do that, like driving, the more likely it will just happen naturally. It's not the number of shots, but the number of shots with thought behind it. Kind of like focused karate kata vs moving around the floor. With one you learn karate, with the other you get some exercise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben H
Yep - slow down and think first. After a while, the thinking gets more instinctive and natural and speeds up...
I'm still waiting for that to happen.. ;)
I started karate in 1989 and I'm still working on improving my punch :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Ben H
We'll tell you next month what our numbers are, we have 3 sports events. One 6 hours, the next one is a 24 hour event and the last one will be around 10 hours but that wil be the hardest and longest as we have to cover over 100kms so we'll have an extra photographer, the daughter is going to fly up to help out. Are you counting what you keep or every photo you take?Quote:
Originally Posted by jjeling