Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Ballheads

This is a discussion on Ballheads within the Camera equipment & accessories forums, part of the Education & Technical category; I am looking at replacing my ballhead with one of the 'pro' ballheads: Markins, Kirk, Really Right Stuff........ I would ...

  1. #1
    Greg_Nuspel's Avatar
    Greg_Nuspel is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,947
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default Ballheads

    I am looking at replacing my ballhead with one of the 'pro' ballheads: Markins, Kirk, Really Right Stuff........

    I would appreciate any recommendations, warnings or general comments about these $pecial ballheads.
    --Greg Nuspel

    I've been sucked into the void of video!!!!!!!

    Flickr

    Vimeo

  2. #2
    AcadieLibre's Avatar
    AcadieLibre is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    2,151
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    Here is decent Blog on the subject. I use Manfrotto heads and never had an issue. You need one that will support your heaviest lens and camera weight and I add 25% overage in weight classification (25% is overkill but go at least 10% over). It is worth the money to buy one that will support more than you require and it will make it far more sturdy.
    “I take photographs with love, so I try to make them art objects. But I make them for myself first and foremost - that is important.” Jacques-Henri Lartigue

    "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

    "Vive L'Acadie, Liberté, égalité, fraternité, ou la mort!"




  3. #3
    tirediron is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,201

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AcadieLibre View Post
    Here is decent Blog on the subject. I use Manfrotto heads and never had an issue. You need one that will support your heaviest lens and camera weight and I add 25% overage in weight classification (25% is overkill but go at least 10% over). It is worth the money to buy one that will support more than you require and it will make it far more sturdy.
    I'll respectfully disagree with my learned colleague on this. I would submit that 25% is the absolute minimum safety margin that one should have. My body and 200 2.8 weigh in at around seven pounds, my Manfrotto 468 head is rated for 16 pounds; in a windy environment even that doesn't always feel super safe.

  4. #4
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    A good ballmount will be seriously appreciated.
    I've been using the manfrotto 222 for a while and I love it. The only issue is that the camera doesn't go vertical at all stops on the head, only certain ones.

    There's also the manfrotto 322 that's similar and can hold more weight.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  5. #5
    jellotranz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    112

    Default

    Hows that work as far as it dropping once you have tightened it down? If I have my 300mm lens mounted on mine, once I tighten it up it still dropps 1/4 inch which really sucks. I don't have this one but I have one from the same manufacturer.

  6. #6
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    A good point jello - haven't tried it on a 300mm but on a 200mm no prob.
    There's an adjustment wheel to make the tension 'stiffer' for heavier lenses.
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  7. #7
    Greg_Nuspel's Avatar
    Greg_Nuspel is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,947
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    I picked up a Markins Q3. As a machinist I was very impressed by the quality of the unit, the fit and finish is excellent. The friction adjustment and locking is wonderful. With drag adjusted the movement is smooth no sticking. Well worth the price and it's the right size for my tripod so I can fold the legs up to keep a minimum length package.
    --Greg Nuspel

    I've been sucked into the void of video!!!!!!!

    Flickr

    Vimeo

  8. #8
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Just checked them out Greg. Does look like a well-made unit.
    http://www.markinsamerica.com/MA5/Q3.php
    Thx
    Marko
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  9. #9
    AntZ's Avatar
    AntZ is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,290
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I think the Manfrotto 222 and 322 would be perfect for use on a monopod. I will get the Manfrotto(because I have other Manfrotto heads) equivalent of the Q3 for use on my tripod. I like the ability to rotate the horizontal plane separately for panoramas.

  10. #10
    Greg_Nuspel's Avatar
    Greg_Nuspel is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,947
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Funny thing is it's hard to find a monopod type head for arca plates. I just need forward aft pivot, guess it's time to make some.
    --Greg Nuspel

    I've been sucked into the void of video!!!!!!!

    Flickr

    Vimeo

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36