Results 1 to 8 of 8
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By theantiquetiger

Soccer photos from this weekend, all out of focus

This is a discussion on Soccer photos from this weekend, all out of focus within the General photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Sorry I don't have any samples (I'm at work, none to post). I shot my daughter's soccer game again this ...

  1. #1
    theantiquetiger's Avatar
    theantiquetiger is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge
    Posts
    2,774
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default Soccer photos from this weekend, all out of focus

    Sorry I don't have any samples (I'm at work, none to post).

    I shot my daughter's soccer game again this weekend (I am now the team photographer). I have been shooting the games all season with basically the same setting with nice results.

    AV mode

    2.8
    160 ISO

    The speed was running around 1200-1500, but this weekend it was up to 3800 due to the very sunny, cloudless day. All the images were soft. I wasn't paying attention to my shots after I took them and didn't notice until I got home.

    I am guessing (and hoping) there is nothing wrong with my camera, and I just had the setting wrong. I should have closed down on the f-stop to get the speed back to 1200-1500. 3800 speed was just way to fast to capture sharp sports images.
    "The worst thing about taking a great image is that your next one has to be better!"

  2. #2
    Iguanasan's Avatar
    Iguanasan is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,917
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Generally speaking, faster should be sharper all other things being equal. The reason is that you are not likely to get motion blur at that speed. Blur from depth of field issues, however, is another matter. If the weather was excellent and lots of light I think I'd move up to f4, f5.6, or even f8 to give yourself more depth of field. If you had them running towards you or away from you it could be that you focused on them when they were at point A but captured the image when they were at point B and the result was out of focus because the depth of field was too narrow and they moved out of the focus zone before the image was captured.
    “If you are out there shooting, things will happen for you. If you’re not out there, you’ll only hear about it.” – Jay Maisel
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Feel free to edit my shots ONLY for use on this forum and critique my shots in ANY discussion area.
    Flickr | Blog | Google+

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    75
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I agree with you that 2.8 was too 'open' - particularly if you're shooting long. Recall that the longer you shoot, the thinner the slice of DOF you're getting for an equivalent aperture. This isn't to say that you should NEVER shoot sports that open--but if you do you have to be on your game, and, well, you'll have to accept that 4 out of 5 shots might be misses.

    In addition to adding some shots to the mix, I'd like to know your camera, lens you were using, what focus mode you were using (point ? zone ? auto select ? servo ?).

    Without seeing anything I'd suggest that it's possible that you were attempting to focus on subjects that didn't have as much contrast as the sunlight hitting the grass + accompanying shadows that might have been present. But it sounds like you were on the sun side (because of your shutter speed) - so, well, that's less likely.
    See Christopher Steven B. Photography for recent wedding and engagement photos.

  4. #4
    theantiquetiger's Avatar
    theantiquetiger is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge
    Posts
    2,774
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I shoot with a Canon 60D and a Tamron 70-200 2.8.

    I shoot them in center weighted exposure, auto focus point selected.
    "The worst thing about taking a great image is that your next one has to be better!"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    75
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Are you using a servo mode for tracking ? If you catch my half marathon thread in the People section you'll see shots of runners for which I used 'one-shot' and not a servo mode--so it's certainly not a requirement, but you may get more hits in servo mode.
    See Christopher Steven B. Photography for recent wedding and engagement photos.

  6. #6
    Iguanasan's Avatar
    Iguanasan is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,917
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Only if servo mode is fast enough with your body/lens combination. I shoot with lower end gear and I was using my T3i and a Sigma 70-300 for the Terry Fox run this past weekend and that camera/lens just can't keep up when in servo mode. I had to go one-shot focus and even then I missed focus on quite a few as they were running towards me. :(
    “If you are out there shooting, things will happen for you. If you’re not out there, you’ll only hear about it.” – Jay Maisel
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Feel free to edit my shots ONLY for use on this forum and critique my shots in ANY discussion area.
    Flickr | Blog | Google+

  7. #7
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Until we see some actual images, this is a lot of guesswork. Post a few and the help will be way more fruitful.
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  8. #8
    theantiquetiger's Avatar
    theantiquetiger is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge
    Posts
    2,774
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    OK, stupid me, I figured out what I did.

    When I took my initial practice shot, it was around 1/3500 speed. I decided to add a filter to help knock down some of the glare. The tinted filter caused my speed to go from around 1/3500 to down to 1/400-1/1000. I never took another test image after adding the filter and was thinking my speed was very fast (not viewing it in the viewfinder). I was only paying attention to the focus points and exposure meter in the viewfinder (because the action is so fast to capture).

    I never even looked at the exif info when I got home (or when I started this thread)

    Lesson learned!!!!

    I needed to up the ISO to get the speed back to my desired 1/2000 or so
    Iguanasan likes this.
    "The worst thing about taking a great image is that your next one has to be better!"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36