Another for the 16 to 35. If you go full frame you are all set. The 17 to 40 is another good choice.
This is a discussion on 10-22 mm or 16-35 mm for 7D within the Camera equipment & accessories forums, part of the Education & Technical category; Another for the 16 to 35. If you go full frame you are all set. The 17 to 40 is ...
Another for the 16 to 35. If you go full frame you are all set. The 17 to 40 is another good choice.
www.steelcityphotography.com
My mistake has been seeking new landscapes. I should have been seeking new light.
I have both lenses and had the 10-22 mm first then I bought the 16 - 35 L f/2.8 and just love it I use it much more than the 10-22 mm when I need the extra wideness but if I had to choose one it would be the 16-35 an the bonus is the faster glass. I like the 10 - 22 and found it to be a good lens but a huge price point between the two lenses.
“I take photographs with love, so I try to make them art objects. But I make them for myself first and foremost - that is important.” Jacques-Henri Lartigue
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke"Vive L'Acadie, Liberté, égalité, fraternité, ou la mort!"
Bookmarks