Results 1 to 10 of 21

Beginner Shots Clock Tower

This is a discussion on Beginner Shots Clock Tower within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; These are some of my First attempts at proper digital photography Im looking for some criticism no matter how harsh ...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Dclark is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3

    Default Beginner Shots Clock Tower

    These are some of my First attempts at proper digital photography

    Im looking for some criticism no matter how harsh on how to improve my photos.

    Thank You in Advance.


    #1


    #2


    #3


    #4

    Sorry For the Wait.

    First post of what i hope to be many!
    Last edited by Dclark; 08-19-2008 at 10:24 AM.
    20 Years From Now You will Be More Dissapointed By The Things You Did Not Do Than By The Things You Did" -Mark Twain

  2. #2
    tirediron is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,201

    Default

    Well... I guess I'll come back tomorrow.

  3. #3
    tomorrowstreasures is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Midwest - USA
    Posts
    1,940
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Smile Nice

    Personal preference, not a critique - I would like to see the vertical lines be at right angles to the edge. I really like the b/w one.

  4. #4
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tomorrowstreasures View Post
    Personal preference, not a critique - I would like to see the vertical lines be at right angles to the edge. I really like the b/w one.
    Actually that is part of critique. Lens/barrel distortion should be minimal or not present at all in telephoto shots. It can however be improved somewhat in postprocessing.

    Tegan
    "Photographic art requires the technical aspects of photography and the design aspects of art, both at an outstanding level."

  5. #5
    tirediron is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,201

    Default

    Hmmmm... to be honest, I'm not sure. Technically they're fine, although the bricks in #3 are somewhat over-exposed, but something isn't working for me in the composition. I can't put my finger on it, and I can't think of a different way that I would have composed these images. I think perhaps it's because there's not enough building. The clock-tower on it's own just isn't enough to hold my interest.

    Just my $00.02 worth - your milage may vary.

    ~John

  6. #6
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tirediron View Post
    Hmmmm... to be honest, I'm not sure. Technically they're fine, although the bricks in #3 are somewhat over-exposed, but something isn't working for me in the composition. I can't put my finger on it, and I can't think of a different way that I would have composed these images. I think perhaps it's because there's not enough building. The clock-tower on it's own just isn't enough to hold my interest.

    Just my $00.02 worth - your milage may vary.

    ~John
    "Technically they're fine." Surely you noticed the lean inward of the tower in number 3 and the lean in the other direction of the rest of the building.

    In number 4, the centre columns lean out from the bottom as you move your eye to the top.

    That is considered lens distortion which is a technical defficiency.


    Tegan
    "Photographic art requires the technical aspects of photography and the design aspects of art, both at an outstanding level."

  7. #7
    pslove is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    24

    Default

    there's not much for me to say, i think, that hasn't already been said. they're nice photos. i think that the halo around the trees in photo 2 is a little distracting. is it caused by the compressing or is it also there in the original photo? it sort of looks like you attempted to burn out the sky a little but didn't finish the job. i also think that when you're shooting straight vertical lines, especially when they are in the centre of the photo, you really need to make sure they are straight. lens distortion is fairly easy to fix in photoshop. it would be a really good photo, i think ,if i wasn't distracted by the crooked lines. can you possibly fix them and repost them with our suggestions? team efforts are fun
    Jess

  8. #8
    Dclark is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3

    Default

    I might just do that, I personally use gimp, so i dont know about that straight line thing but ill give it a go eh.
    20 Years From Now You will Be More Dissapointed By The Things You Did Not Do Than By The Things You Did" -Mark Twain

  9. #9
    merlyn9 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    I tend to live out of a suit case
    Posts
    5

    Default

    In the color shots, my personal opinion, the sky seems too unnatual, too blue.
    The clock face itself has a blue tint to it.

    Looks like you may have used "Shadow/Highlights" in Photoshop, or something similar. Take a look along the treeline, and around the Dome itself... There's some haloing beginning to show through.

    I also agree with the vertical lines comment.
    You are almost 45/90 degrees flush with that corner. Line this up in the view finder, then work your vertical camera angle (tilt) until you get minimal distortion in the building. Anything left you can adjust more as needed withing Photoshop or your favorite Image Editing tool.

    Sweet Clock Tower though!


    ---michael

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36