Unedited picture
This is a discussion on My Old Dog within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Unedited picture...
Unedited picture
First I'll start off by saying that posting undedited (Which I read as "unprocessed") images isn't really appropriate. No image is ever at it's best when it comes out of the camera. Just as in the days of the darkroom there was always something to tweak, there are always things that you can and/or should do in the pixlel room. You might well be critiqued on a point which you would have corrected in post.
So, on to the image: Overall, I'm afraid it seems very 'snap-shotish' to me. The background, while slightly softly focused is far too cluttered and distracting. Additionally, the dog himself is not ideally positioned. My preference is that with animals it's better to either get just a head shot or a whole body shot, but a 3/4 body shot looks like careless composition (whether intentional or not). Lastly, I can't be 100% sure, but it looks like you may have missed the focus a little. His eyes don't seem completely sharp to me.
Given the area, I think this might have worked better if you'd zoomed in for a head shot from a slightly lower shooting position. Keep at it!
Just my $00.02 worth - your milage may vary.
~John
I agree with TI here.
I like it when animals look into the camera or that you can see their eyes more clearly.
This pose as it is in the shot, might work better if all the clutter on the left were cropped right out.
Tegan - typos/misspellings are rampant on the Net....you'll never sleep if you start correcting people's spelling (and many people won't like it..trust me - through T.I is a cool dude fer sure)
Last edited by Marko; 10-09-2008 at 09:07 AM.
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
gawd........ it must drive u crazy to read my posts... funny thing is I write business letr's all day and look forward to the loose communicative style of the internet.... sorta like taking the tie off...
on the other hand.. i think it's important to learn proper english structure before disemboweling it... something I am not sure is happening with the youth of today...
______________________
Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285
I agree that many people, especially younger people can't spell, but this is not a spelling forum and correcting people's spelling often starts threadwars and bad feelings...something I like to avoid..
- Please connect with me further
Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
- Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
- Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
- Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
- Check out the photography podcast
"You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.
back to critiquing the dog pic - i think if you try and capture the dog with an uncluttered background, the outcome would be much better.... he would stand out a lot more. nice lighting however!
Marko, I think that a phrase that is constantly repeated at the end of a post should at least be spelled correctly. That should NOT be an unrealistic expectation from any educated person to any other educated person. Moreover if attention to detail in photography is important than it should be part of written expression as well.
Tegan
Last edited by tegan; 10-09-2008 at 08:23 PM.
"Photographic art requires the technical aspects of photography and the design aspects of art, both at an outstanding level."
Bookmarks