Results 1 to 7 of 7

Post processing ; challenging problem

This is a discussion on Post processing ; challenging problem within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; The first photo is the post processed one, the second is the original (unchanged raw image). There are obvious problems ...

  1. #1
    kevin99989 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
    Posts
    117
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default Post processing ; challenging problem

    The first photo is the post processed one, the second is the original (unchanged raw image).

    There are obvious problems in the post processed one. Just wondering how you would handle the dark/light contrast areas differently? ie - the part where the water meets the sky. (Note: there is no tree behind the largest pillar of water. Its background is the sky)

    I used Lightroom, with 2 different exposure brush "densities" on the water area near the sky.

    Also, please comment on the effect that I'm trying to achieve. I wish to highlight the water as well as the sky.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

     

    Last edited by kevin99989; 10-20-2011 at 07:51 PM.

  2. #2
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I think you have done a decent job here for 1 frame. Your camera can only handle so much range in a given exposure and this is the reason for the popularity of HDR where people shoot multiple frames of the same image using different exposures and blend them in post.

    The whites are likely clipped in this RAW image therefore more burning will probably look bad. You'll probably have to resort to cloning and other processing 'tricks' to get more meat out of the sky.
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  3. #3
    kevin99989 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
    Posts
    117
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    thanks Marko,
    I've tried doing several exposures, but the fountain was changing so much (water output, height, etc - it's a "dancing fountain") the water was in different positions in each shot.

    I will try that clone stamp on the some of the parts!

  4. #4
    Bambi's Avatar
    Bambi is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    9,755
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    here's my version:
    I duplicated the layers, adjusted the curves and details, then duplicated again- adjusted the curves to darken the sky and then masked it through
    Name:  fountain.jpg
Views: 210
Size:  151.3 KB
    Feel free to make comments on any of my shots

    my blog: http://bambesblog.blogspot.com/

    My flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bambe1964/

    A painter takes their vision and makes it a reality. A photographer takes reality and makes it their vision.

  5. #5
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kevin99989 View Post
    thanks Marko,
    I've tried doing several exposures, but the fountain was changing so much (water output, height, etc - it's a "dancing fountain") the water was in different positions in each shot.

    I will try that clone stamp on the some of the parts!
    I hear ya but the blown part is the problem. not the moving water. so the blown sky doesn't move if you shoot fast...the water is close to blocking that bright spot but I think this was saveable with an additional exposure of around -3 stops

    You'd layer the dark image under this one and blend only that problem spot .

    (Nice stab bambi)
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  6. #6
    kevin99989 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
    Posts
    117
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Wow - thanks for that Bambi - it looks amazing! Can you tell me more details of how you did that (unless it's your trade secret .

    there were 2 layers in total, right? When you "masked it through", which blending mode did you use, or was it the sky portion in the darker layer being masked through (ie. with none of the sky from the lighter layer)? If so, you must have increased the mid-tone contrast quite a bit while creating the darker layer?

    Thanks in advance!!

  7. #7
    Bambi's Avatar
    Bambi is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    9,755
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kevin99989 View Post
    Wow - thanks for that Bambi - it looks amazing! Can you tell me more details of how you did that (unless it's your trade secret .

    there were 2 layers in total, right? When you "masked it through", which blending mode did you use, or was it the sky portion in the darker layer being masked through (ie. with none of the sky from the lighter layer)? If so, you must have increased the mid-tone contrast quite a bit while creating the darker layer?

    Thanks in advance!!
    thanks. all I did was play with what was there. I have no trade secrets just a crappy memory. I believe that I did exactly what you said and yes I played with the midtone contrasts.
    Feel free to make comments on any of my shots

    my blog: http://bambesblog.blogspot.com/

    My flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bambe1964/

    A painter takes their vision and makes it a reality. A photographer takes reality and makes it their vision.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36