Results 1 to 2 of 2

Keeping it simple

This is a discussion on Keeping it simple within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Hi Tegan, Problems are so subjective and often the photographer sees problems in their own shots when others see no ...

  1. #1
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default Keeping it simple

    Hi Tegan,

    Problems are so subjective and often the photographer sees problems in their own shots when others see no problems. I guess if I was searching for problems, I'd say it's the lack of detail in the background...

    However MOST decent photos can be made stronger with some photoshopping. In this case, severe cropping would make this a very strong shot. If you were to turn this landscape into a portrait by cropping 40% on the left side, the photograph takes on a new and stronger dimension.

    Just a thought,

    Marko



    Well, not all shots work out exactly the way you want and in this case I was shooting in very heavy fog. Can you spot the problems?

    Tegan
    Attached Images Attached Images  

    Last edited by Marko; 02-11-2007 at 10:42 AM.

  2. #2
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    [QUOTE=tegan]Hi Tegan,

    Problems are so subjective and often the photographer sees problems in their own shots when others see no problems. I guess if I was searching for problems, I'd say it's the lack of detail in the background...

    However MOST decent photos can be made stronger with some photoshopping. In this case, severe cropping would make this a very strong shot. If you were to turn this landscape into a portrait by cropping 40% on the left side, the photograph takes on a new and stronger dimension.

    Just a thought,

    Marko

    I think you just proved that problems are not really that subjective after all.
    You are absolutely correct. It would be stronger as a portrait.

    Heavy fog also makes a less than excellent background and the problem here is the lighthouse colour is so close to the fog colour that it won't be easy to separate the two, in order to photoshop in a blue sky, but I will give it a try.

    It would be better for composition, if the gull were slightly higher, with the sky, not the rock behind the bottom part of it, but that is not very controllable.

    The problem that you did not mention is that the gull particularly is a little soft. Either the depth of field did not quite cover it, or the fog interfered. Some attempted photoshop sharpening caused artifacts, so I left it mostly alone.

    The commercial value of it, as it is, by the way, is that the lack of background is perfect for text use or as part of a collage.

    Tegan
    Last edited by tegan; 02-13-2007 at 09:30 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36