Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Ball cap fence

This is a discussion on Ball cap fence within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; This is about an hour or more south of Calgary. Took a few shots of it but not super happy ...

  1. #1
    ruleofthirds is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    52

    Default Ball cap fence

    This is about an hour or more south of Calgary. Took a few shots of it but not super happy with how they came out. Thoughts, suggestions??

    Name:  IMG_5044.jpg
Views: 307
Size:  145.5 KB
    Corey Kaye
    We're all looking to improve, be honest, i can take it.
    http://ruleofthirds.ca
    http://twitter.com/corey_kaye
    http://coreykaye.com

  2. #2
    Iguanasan's Avatar
    Iguanasan is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,917
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Here are my thoughts. I think if you'd followed your own name (rule of thirds) you might have found it a bit more pleasing. Also, I'd have closed down and increased the DOF to try and keep as many hats in focus as possible.

    The last thing is that you need to lose the silo. Not sure if a different angle would have worked or if you might consider photoshopping it out but it drags the eye away from the fence line which is the point of interest.
    “If you are out there shooting, things will happen for you. If you’re not out there, you’ll only hear about it.” – Jay Maisel
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Feel free to edit my shots ONLY for use on this forum and critique my shots in ANY discussion area.
    Flickr | Blog | Google+

  3. #3
    nomad358 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    128
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I somewhat agree with the previous message, I think a different angle would have been good here. But, I really like this. Nice job!

  4. #4
    tirediron is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,201

    Default

    Neat idea; I'm thinking a slightly lower shooting position, further to your right so that you were shooting more "down the line" of the fence might have worked better.

  5. #5
    scorpio_e's Avatar
    scorpio_e is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Easton Pa
    Posts
    524
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    A little more DOF on the hats would have improved the image.
    Overall ..It's a nice shot
    www.steelcityphotography.com

    My mistake has been seeking new landscapes. I should have been seeking new light.

  6. #6
    photoviolin is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hudson, WI
    Posts
    8

    Default

    I agree with the DOF comment, and I think a crop that goes between the first to hats, cuts the sky and mountains, would be another way to increase our eyes on the subject. For me, I find cropping much easier than cloning. Neat idea! Tough light to shoot in and you handled it pretty well.

  7. #7
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I don't mind the composition one bit. The silo does attract a bit of attention but it also gives the shot a sense of place. I might burn it in instead on cloning out. What I do agree on is DOF. I would have stopped all the way down on this one. Hope that help - Marko
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  8. #8
    jabber's Avatar
    jabber is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Yes, more DOF would help, but I like this. The colors seem slightly washed out (hazy light?), and perhaps there's a bit of inessential space up top. But interesting subject.
    Canon 40D, 10-22/3.5-4.5, 17-55/2.8 IS, 70-200/4L, 60/2.8 Macro, 85/1.8, 1.4x II Extender, Lensbaby Composer

    "I take photographs to see what the thing looks like photographed." -Gary Winogrand

  9. #9
    ruleofthirds is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Thaks everyon! To be honest i take most things at F8 or better and thought i'd play with some DOF, maybe not the best time. There was enought light to shoot handheld at F11 i have a similar shot with more DOF, i think. Will take a look and repost.
    Corey Kaye
    We're all looking to improve, be honest, i can take it.
    http://ruleofthirds.ca
    http://twitter.com/corey_kaye
    http://coreykaye.com

  10. #10
    ruleofthirds is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    52

    Default

    I just happen to have one at F8 and i think you're all right, maybe F16 would have been the right answer... needed a tripod.

    Name:  IMG_5040-2.jpg
Views: 219
Size:  132.0 KB
    Corey Kaye
    We're all looking to improve, be honest, i can take it.
    http://ruleofthirds.ca
    http://twitter.com/corey_kaye
    http://coreykaye.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36