Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Old Church

This is a discussion on Old Church within the Critiques forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; The first shot was taken at the right angle but unfortunately the front steps are cut off and it is ...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    The first shot was taken at the right angle but unfortunately the front steps are cut off and it is just slightly tilted. The grass also iindicates a little over-saturation.

    The second is from the side of the church with the shadows which creates exposure problems. It is difficult to get the right amount of transparency and the right amount of detail in shadows created by a sunny day.

    As to the third, to be blunt, forceful, and passionate, I am strongly against black and white because it is most often done with poor exposure and insufficient variation in tones and grey scale.

    Tegan

  2. #2
    Travis is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Huntsville Muskoka
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tegan
    The first shot was taken at the right angle but unfortunately the front steps are cut off and it is just slightly tilted. The grass also iindicates a little over-saturation.

    The second is from the side of the church with the shadows which creates exposure problems. It is difficult to get the right amount of transparency and the right amount of detail in shadows created by a sunny day.

    As to the third, to be blunt, forceful, and passionate, I am strongly against black and white because it is most often done with poor exposure and insufficient variation in tones and grey scale.

    Tegan

    On the first shot I really wanted to use the tree in the rear... it's a beautiful tree... however it got lost in the shot.. and it distracted me from the stairs...

    well.. i gotta do some black and white here and there... especially with an old subject like this... tell me what steps i should take to improve the exposure/tones etc... camera settings? something I should do in post? you know i'm not big on post so give me some camera setting tips...
    ______________________

    Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285

  3. #3
    kiley9806 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    AB Canada
    Posts
    731
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default

    lol - ok, well, props for laying on 'sleeping' people in attempt to get the right postion!
    i didnt notice that tree in the back of shot one - it does get a little lost, so maybe next time youre in the area, you can take some special shots of just the tree. it certainly looks like it would be a good subject too.

  4. #4
    kiley9806 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    AB Canada
    Posts
    731
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default

    oh, and i dont know if its the 'right' thing to do - but with these old buildings, i find it interesting to get up real close and find details in the craftsmanship. the logs, the foundation, the windows. you might experiment with singling out specific parts of the arcitecture thats unique to the structure.

  5. #5
    Travis is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Huntsville Muskoka
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiley9806
    lol - ok, well, props for laying on 'sleeping' people in attempt to get the right postion!
    i didnt notice that tree in the back of shot one - it does get a little lost, so maybe next time youre in the area, you can take some special shots of just the tree. it certainly looks like it would be a good subject too.

    oh... i shot the tree... but the line of trees on the rear was too distracting to post for critque.... tall pines surround the church..
    Attached Images Attached Images  

     

    ______________________

    Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285

  6. #6
    kiley9806 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    AB Canada
    Posts
    731
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default

    hmm, bummer - the branches of that main tree are great... but talk about a nightmare cloning out those spruce...

  7. #7
    Travis is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Huntsville Muskoka
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiley9806
    hmm, bummer - the branches of that main tree are great... but talk about a nightmare cloning out those spruce...
    yeah... not my style... photoshoping reminds me of doing homework in school.... there will be more tree's without distraction... i will find them and shoot them.. it's the best part of the hobby..........
    ______________________

    Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285

  8. #8
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Travis
    On the first shot I really wanted to use the tree in the rear... it's a beautiful tree... however it got lost in the shot.. and it distracted me from the stairs...

    well.. i gotta do some black and white here and there... especially with an old subject like this... tell me what steps i should take to improve the exposure/tones etc... camera settings? something I should do in post? you know i'm not big on post so give me some camera setting tips...
    Well, with your permission, I can show you a one click improvement of your black and white image in postprocessing. I do post, but I prefer fast post. A second post option is an excellent black and white software filter which emphasizes tones from Nik software.

    As to camera settings, are you using the black and white setting in the camera menu? Some cameras have a backlighting mode which would fit this image too. Most have an option for spot metering (on the building) which I would also use. Another option is using a linear neutral grad filter tilted to the left side to cover part of the sky so that you could boost the exposure for the building to get more detail. Still another option is to reduce contrast in camera and then selectively (sky and building separately) increase it in post.

    Another reason I don't like black and white is that it takes one heck of a lot of work in camera and post to get it technically right, despite any possible issues with compostion. Many black and white enthusiasts say that film is still better for black and white. I can't say that I have seen any excellent digital black and white work on the net, so perhaps they are correct.

    Tegan

  9. #9
    Travis is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Huntsville Muskoka
    Posts
    678

    Default

    you have permission to edit my photos any time..... i'm here to learn....

    I posted these photo's from the house so I don't have the exif data on them... but I'm pretty sure I used the onboard BW function...

    I have been reading Peterson's Understanding Exposure and experimenting with his metering methods. I think I shot manual @ f9 and took a center weighted reading from the sky to adjust shutter... either that or I metered the grass and adjusted shutter to achevie a -2/3 exposure..... i'm not sure his book is relevant with the advent of matrix metering...

    I didn't think to spot meter the church because I figured it would blow out the sky.....

    If you have a fast post method share it up....

    a grad filter is something I've been thinking about picking up... i think it would be the best option for this kinda shot...

    do you have recommendations for a commonly used linear filter? how many stops from top to bottom?
    ______________________

    Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285

  10. #10
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    This was done with one click of the "Enhance Photo" bar item in Paint Shop Pro X2. You can get a 30 day download free from www.corel.ca.

    Tegan


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36