Results 1 to 6 of 6

Help choosing a macro lens

This is a discussion on Help choosing a macro lens within the Digital photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Hi guys, I have a Nikon D3100 and am looking at purchasing my first macro lens. I'm having issues deciding ...

  1. #1
    baseball105 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    2
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default Help choosing a macro lens

    Hi guys,

    I have a Nikon D3100 and am looking at purchasing my first macro lens. I'm having issues deciding which lens of the following lenses would work best for me.

    Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di VC USD Macro for Nikon
    http://www.amazon.ca/Tamron-AFF004N7...ds=tamron+90mm

    Nikon AF-S 60mm Micro Nikkor F/2.8G ED
    http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B001..._cd_al_qh_dp_t

    I would be interesting in photographing bugs/flowers, things at the beach etc. I understand that my camera is DX so the Tamron would be 135mm and the Nikon 90mm. Are there limitations to putting these lenses on a DX camera? The difference between the working distance of the lenses is 2cm so that doesn't really seem to be an issue, I'm just not sure if 135mm is too much zoom or 90mm is too little. Is it safer to go with a Nikon lens? I've heard the Tamron is just as good. I'm also wondering if having the Nikon would work better for me to be able to get a bit more background in the photo, but I also like how close of a photo I could get with a longer lens.

    Thanks for any input you can give

    EDIT: I also just realized that the Nikon lens does not have VR. Is that going to be a huge problem?
    Last edited by baseball105; 12-08-2015 at 03:31 PM.

  2. #2
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,116
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    The lower the focal number, the closer you have to be to your subject....since this can scare off insects I'd likely get the 90mm (IFF it has good reviews and I can return it if I don't like it.)
    Feel free of course to go to a store and actually try the lens(es) to see their differences on your camera before purchasing. THAT will be your best test.
    Hope that may help
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  3. #3
    baseball105 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    2
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Thanks for your input. I was in the local photography store the other day and they do not have either of the lenses, but it has been suggested to me by a friend to see if they have approximately the same lengths to see the difference between the two.

  4. #4
    Barefoot's Avatar
    Barefoot is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Aiken, SC
    Posts
    2,266
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I have the older version of the Nikkor 60mm without the internal focusing motor. That's never been a problem for me when doing macro work and it can be had for half the price of the later model. Still, I wish I had opted for the 105mm 2.8. It seems as though the 60mm is often in its own way.

    After more than a few years of shooting with Tamron glass, I can also say that money invested in Tamron lenses is money well spent.
    We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are. -Ana´s Nin

    http://barefoot.pixu.com/

  5. #5
    Rdbender is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    236
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I love my Tamron 90mm 2.8 on my nikon D5100 and D7100

  6. #6
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,116
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Still, I wish I had opted for the 105mm 2.8. It seems as though the 60mm is often in its own way.
    I agree and did this research years ago - I have the the 105mm 2.8 and it is fab for Macro!
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36