Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Can someone help me with this?

This is a discussion on Can someone help me with this? within the General photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; ok, the vibrant colourful shot is what I have been doing so far, the other one is what I want ...

  1. #1
    lenfisher1973 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kelowna b.c.
    Posts
    14
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default Can someone help me with this?

    ok, the vibrant colourful shot is what I have been doing so far, the other one is what I want to achieve but am having trouble, Canon t1i using either my new 70-200mm f4L, or my 50mm 1.8, if someone can help me with some basic settings to get started, natural lighting tips, and other advice to achieve shots much like this one, I don't know what picture style in my t1i i should be using, or if customizing one is best,, all other advice is greatly appreciated to help me achieve a result like this, I am well aware of how important crisp focus is, and I'm working hard on that, I think that colour and exposure are issues in getting shots like this one,

    Thank you

    Len
    Attached Images Attached Images  

     


  2. #2
    Iguanasan's Avatar
    Iguanasan is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,917
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Well, let's start at the beginning. Are you shooting JPGs or RAW? If you are shooting JPG are you using any special settings of the picture style mode or is it in the default of "Standard"?

    Your image above seems very orange to me for some reason. Not sure if it's camera settings or post-processing with a monitor that is not colour calibrated. Or did you have a filter on the camera? What settings were you using for this shot? I see a catchlight from the flash in the eyes. Are you using the built-in flash or do you have a separate flash mounted on the hot shoe? And what did you have your White Balance settings set to?

    Sorry, lots of questions but the answers will help determine where the issues may lie...

    Oh, and if you don't mind would it be OK if I did a quick edit on your sample image to try and colour correct it a bit? (Not that I'm very good, others might be better)
    “If you are out there shooting, things will happen for you. If you’re not out there, you’ll only hear about it.” – Jay Maisel
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Feel free to edit my shots ONLY for use on this forum and critique my shots in ANY discussion area.
    Flickr | Blog | Google+

  3. #3
    Matt K.'s Avatar
    Matt K. is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    3,547
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Looks like a JPG shot with the wrong white balance to me. Some of the "pre-programmed" settings on a camera are more trouble than they're worth. I would suggest you shoot in RAW, and then do the processing after.
    ~~ Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder ~~

  4. #4
    Mad Aussie's Avatar
    Mad Aussie is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Qld, Australia
    Posts
    14,098
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Here's my thoughts ...

    Judging by your description Len, you are expecting to achieve the same results as the first photo in a single shot with a camera and flash.

    If you look at that first shot closely you'll notice there is no strong sunlight around at all. They picked a day where there was a low dynamic range ... i.e ... no strong light creating bright areas and dark shadows. It's possible they used a reflector or weak flash setting to fill the faces as well.

    Also, the depth of field (area in focus) is very narrow. I think this was achieved with a zoom lens and I'd say well up in the 150mm or 200mm range.

    To emulate what you see in that first image, I think these are the things you first need to replicate.

    In your own attempt, the white balance is definitely off, giving that strong orange cast. This could also be in the jpg menu settings you choose. Because I see some post processing going on there (I'll mention that shortly) I know you can bring out colour etc later so I suggest you set those menu settings to as natural/ neutral as possible.

    You've added a blur of some type to soften the people which hasn't worked well because now their outlines are softer than the background. Not saying don't use a glamour blur, but it must be in harmony with the rest of the photo as well.

    Eyes look sharp, that's a good thing.

    So, in summary, get those two, very good looking people, back out there when the light is far more neutral (not bright or casting a strong colour), get back away from them, don't sit them so close to the flowers (or sit them in amongst them if the area is wide enough), zoom in, and snap away with a few different settings and see what you get. Start with an aperture around f5.6 - f8 if light allows and adjust the shutter speed to suit.

  5. #5
    lenfisher1973 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kelowna b.c.
    Posts
    14
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Shooting in raw for sure, on the picture setting issue, i'm using a customized version of lanscape actually, probably the wrong one for what i want because saturation is boosted way up on it, should i be in standard? the orange was initially due to the setting sun with absolutely no clouds, and then when i edited it i boosted it it some more, way too much obviously wich created the orange, no filter, oddly enough, no flash at all, not sure where the glimmer in the eyes came from, i hnestly don't recall my white balance setting, but likely auto, do you think some colour balance tool might be useful for me? like maybe a greycard?, please, have atter for editing, see what you can do, i can even email you the original if this is to compressed to do much with it
    appreciate anything you have for advice and results, i have been playing around with more neutral picture style settings and that has me a little closer

  6. #6
    lenfisher1973 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kelowna b.c.
    Posts
    14
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Shortly after i got my t1i i learned the hard way to always shoot in raw, i lost out on an incredible opportunity with a lynx in a tree enjoying a feast of rabbit on a winter morning, it was incredible, i stood under the tree for at least 45 minutes shooting, and got nothing but junkie shots, i almost cried when i got home, shoot in raw ever since that religously, and edit raw as well

  7. #7
    lenfisher1973 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kelowna b.c.
    Posts
    14
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Wow, thank you so much for your advice, looking at the photo i did while using your points as a checklist i see clearer now what i need to do and look for in shooting, and do less of in editing, i've already experimented with neutral picture style settings and that has helped, do you suggest some sort of white balance tool like a "cap" or greycard, as apposed to trying to match the few automatic settings on the camera? i shot this using my 70-200 f4L but at 70mm, i see your point about getting back and zooming in, as well as the proximity to the background for the subjects, these are actually 2 of my employees and i love them to death, sweet couple and i wanted to get them some great shots, they are letting me shoot again this weekend but it is supposed to be similar conditions as this shot, so i think i will do some scouting and find somewhere with either some "sun blockage" like a canopy of trees, or do you think that a complete even shade would be good as well? i have a 5 in 1 reflector wich also acts as a difuser if i take the coloured sleeve off, i can maybe difuse if i need to, or reflect to fill as you suggested, Thank all of you very much for your advice, my last shots i asked for critique on were just not in focus, and i have worked on that since, i hope that the focus in this sample is much better

  8. #8
    lenfisher1973 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kelowna b.c.
    Posts
    14
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    just out of curiousity, what is it that made all of you believe i was shooting jpeg? you all brought it up, so there must be something in the image that tips you off to that, is it an image quality thing? sometimes i notice, but not as much with my L lens, that i get strange and unwanted colours on edges where they shouldn't be, too saturated maybe? thanks

  9. #9
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    i'm using a customized version of lanscape actually, probably the wrong one for what i want because saturation is boosted way up on it, should i be in standard?
    Why would you use this setting for a portrait when the setting is called landscape? That's just asking for trouble imo because you are going against what the setting is for....and if this landscape setting is your default setting for all shots, again you are just asking for trouble.

    Do pure landscape shots work with this setting?

    Bright sun needs a setting, cloudy days another setting, lightbulbs need another setting...etc. One setting will never cut it, ever, because different lights have different colour temperatures and individual settings are set for more specific colour temperature ranges.

    Personally I shoot most stuff with the AWB (automatic white balance) Then I correct as needed in photoshop but it's usually reasonably close.
    Hope that helps - Marko
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  10. #10
    Mad Aussie's Avatar
    Mad Aussie is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Qld, Australia
    Posts
    14,098
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Good grief ... you've asked a LOT of questions in there!! I'll start slicing through them ...

    Why did we think jpg. The white balance being so far off. When you should AND process RAW, you just adjust the white as you please during processing. So, although using a grey card will aid in getting it right at the time, you don't actually need it as you can adjust easily later.

    Strange unwanted colours. Guessing you are talking about the cyan or pink edges you get along some edges. If so, this is called Chromatic Aberration and occurs along the edges of things in your photo where very bright meets very dark. Think of lightning ... bright lightning against a dark night sky. You often see this CA there. Many RAW processing software have something for removing it. Cheaper lenses create it more readily than something like Canon's L Series like you are using but you'll still get it with them too.

    Auto Settings. I don't use them at all. I shoot RAW and process (develop) everything later in the digital darkroom of Photoshop.

    Lighting/Shade. Under a canopy of trees is ok if it's even light. If it's mottled light it will create shadows where you don't want them. Once you've chosen your spot, just try the reflectors and see if they seem to help. Even a tiny bit of reflected light on a face can help.

    Focus. Well the diffused glow around the couple pretty much made focus impossible to tell. The eyes still appeared sharp but nothing else did. This helped lead me to believe you had applied a glamour blur or even an ethereal glow filter to soften the skin. I'm really surprised to learn you didn't.

    I wouldn't mind seeing the original and having a crack at processing it actually. I'll pm you with an email address as you suggested.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36