Results 1 to 4 of 4

New Sony Alphas

This is a discussion on New Sony Alphas within the General photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; At PMA 2007 in Las Vegas recently, Sony showed a mid level Alpha and what they are calling their flagship ...

  1. #1
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default New Sony Alphas

    At PMA 2007 in Las Vegas recently, Sony showed a mid level Alpha and what they are calling their flagship Alpha with no dates for distribution yet and few details. This pic is the mid level, which they are predicting for this year sometime.

    Reading between the lines of what Sony is saying, it seems to be designed to compete with the Canon Mark II and Mark III. It is a new chip, not the CMOS sensor that is in the current Alpha. From the size of the cameras, it looks like full size 35mm. (no 1.5 factor). The BIONZ engine has been adjusted to provide much more dynamic tonal range for higher quality images.
    Higher speed shooting, faster focusing in low light, wireless transmitting of the image to a computer, a much brighter pentaprism viewfinder, and live preview are probably in the mix too. Both cameras seem to have Zeiss lenses.

    The flagship by the way has a 85mm 1.4 Zeiss t* lens on it and I notice a depth of field preview button.

    I would say that the mid range Alpha should have about 14 megapixels and probably come in at the $2,000 range to be priced competitively. With the flagship, I would not be at all surprised at 20 megapixels with some interesting improvements over the the top of the line Canon at 16.7 megapixels. Price would be under the $8,000 Canon price.

    Tegan
    Last edited by tegan; 04-01-2007 at 03:59 PM.

  2. #2
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    Personally.....Unless I could really justify it (like your work pays for it or your dayrate is 1000.00 +) - I would not be spending more than 1500-2000 on a digital camera at this point. Current digital Cameras in this range are excellent - especially if you rarely enlarge greater than 11x14 inches. The technology is changing so fast that within 6 months you'll probably regret spending so much cash. I'd wait till we settle down a bit and prices drop. 8 grand on a digital SLR is just not worth it IMO at this point.

  3. #3
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marko
    Personally.....Unless I could really justify it (like your work pays for it or your dayrate is 1000.00 +) - I would not be spending more than 1500-2000 on a digital camera at this point. Current digital Cameras in this range are excellent - especially if you rarely enlarge greater than 11x14 inches. The technology is changing so fast that within 6 months you'll probably regret spending so much cash. I'd wait till we settle down a bit and prices drop. 8 grand on a digital SLR is just not worth it IMO at this point.
    I agree. The other problem that seldom gets mentioned is that the higher end DSLRs tend to be rather large, heavy, and unwieldy and 72mm diameter to 77mm kit lenses certainly add to the size as well.

    Tegan
    Last edited by tegan; 03-31-2007 at 08:10 PM.

  4. #4
    ScenicBC is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    5

    Default

    I'm definitely learning more towards Pentax then whatever Sony has coming up.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36