Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Ideal focal for portraits

This is a discussion on Ideal focal for portraits within the General photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Hi everyone, I always thought that the best focal length for portraits was about 80-100mm, that it was the most ...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    benoitc23 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    6

    Default Ideal focal for portraits

    Hi everyone,

    I always thought that the best focal length for portraits was about 80-100mm, that it was the most flattering for your subjects.
    That over 100mm, everything was too compressed in the photo and it lost it's impact.
    Too wide, your subject looked distorted.

    Lately, i'm hearing that alot of pros use those long lenses (200-400mm) for portraits.
    And that wide angle lens are increasingly used for portraits, and i've seen some really good pictures done between 24-36mm.

    I don't know what's best to use anymore!
    It's like, really, any focal is good as long as you use it well in it's limitations?!

    What focal do you personaly prefer for portraits?
    Anyone knows some tips for portraits in wide-angle that are not distorted?
    Last edited by benoitc23; 07-26-2008 at 10:44 AM.

  2. #2
    Marko's Avatar
    Marko is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal, QC. Canada
    Posts
    14,870
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I'm not sure about what's 'best' anymore given crop factors with DSLR cameras. I can say that I my 70-200 mm for portraits and I'm often working at the 110-200mm end. I see no reason why interesting portraits cannot be taken with a 200-400mm. The main con might be the fact that those lenses (especially the good ones) are big to lug around and expensive and need faster shutter speeds when hand-held....making them often more suitable for images that need a tripod (which is not the best for casual portraits. The BEST focal length will always be personal.

    I've taken many portraits with wide angles. As you get closer to the subject the image distorts. Back off just a bit and the distortion is WAY less noticeable.

    Hope that helps!
    Marko

    Quote Originally Posted by benoitc23 View Post
    Hi everyone,

    I always thought that the best focal length for portraits was about 80-100mm, that it was the most flattering for your subjects.
    That over 100mm, everything was too compressed in the photo and it lost it's impact.
    Too wide, your subject looked distorted.

    Lately, i'm hearing that alot of pros use those long lenses (200-400mm) for portraits.
    And that wide angle lens are increasingly used for portraits, and i've seen some really good pictures done between 24-36mm.

    I don't know what's best to use anymore!
    It's like, really, any focal is good as long as you use it well in it's limitations?!

    What focal do you personaly prefer for portraits?
    Anyone knows some tips for portraits in wide-angle that are not distorted?
    - Please connect with me further
    Photo tours of Montreal - Private photography courses
    - Join the new Photography.ca Facebook page
    - Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/markokulik
    - Follow me on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/111159185852360398018/posts
    - Check out the photography podcast


    "You have to milk the cow quite a lot, and get plenty of milk to get a little cheese." Henri Cartier-Bresson from The Decisive Moment.

  3. #3
    baddness is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    142

    Default

    I was told that 50mm or an 85mm are good for portraits. I have the 75-300 but I use that for sports and haven't tried it for portraits.

  4. #4
    tirediron is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,201

    Default

    I've had some good results using my 60mm (90mm equiv) for portrait work, and the venerable 50mm 1.4 is hard to beat as well. A lot depends on how much room you have. If I actually did any serious portrait work, this little toy would be a must: http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses...dc-nikkor.html

  5. #5
    baddness is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    142

    Default

    ack that a nikon lens

  6. #6
    benoitc23 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Thanks all for your input!
    I rarely do portraits, but for now I think I will stick mainly to my 50mm prime (100mm equivalent on my E-410) since it's my best lens.
    I might experiment with wide-angle when I don't want to blur the background.. do more a story-telling kind of portrait.

    Happy shooting!

  7. #7
    Richard Annable is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    7

    Default

    With the possible expections of the extremes focal ranges (fisheye and super telephoto) don't discount any lens as a portrait lens as each will provide you a different look and feel.

    My favourite two are the 85 1.8 and the 70-200 2.8. In theory these are either side of the 100mm standard.
    Wedding Portrait & Event Photographer
    www.rxaphotography.com

  8. #8
    tegan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Annable View Post
    With the possible expections of the extremes focal ranges (fisheye and super telephoto) don't discount any lens as a portrait lens as each will provide you a different look and feel.

    My favourite two are the 85 1.8 and the 70-200 2.8. In theory these are either side of the 100mm standard.

    Well the 85mm 1.8 is an excellent portrait lens and I have used a 200mm 2.8 prime for memorable 8 by 10 portraits of children, so I would say that my experience supports your views.

    Tegan
    "Photographic art requires the technical aspects of photography and the design aspects of art, both at an outstanding level."

  9. #9
    AcadieLibre's Avatar
    AcadieLibre is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    2,151
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    I have found it depends on what I want from the portrait on what lens I use. I show up the shoot, get a feel for who I am shooing, the environment and what I want to accomplish. Not sure if this was mentioned, but remember if you have a cropped camera you need to take the into consideration for what lens you use and what you buy.

    I find I shoot a lot of my portraits with me 70-200 mm 2.8 lens, just find I am more creative with it, and all depends on what you want out of portrait. I do lots of musicians and I try to me creative in my portraits of them. So far no unhappy people and if they like it, their reps want to use it I know I have accomplished what I have set out to do. If I am not happy with it they never see it, they like what I give them, but what is important to me is I like it, if they don't they can hire someone else. Has yet to happen and all my referrals are through those I have already done work for. Experiment as someone else mentioned.
    “I take photographs with love, so I try to make them art objects. But I make them for myself first and foremost - that is important.” Jacques-Henri Lartigue

    "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

    "Vive L'Acadie, Liberté, égalité, fraternité, ou la mort!"




  10. #10
    mindforge is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Visalia, CA
    Posts
    330

    Default

    I only shoot lifestyle portraits or as I like to call them 'active portraits'. I move a lot, can't really use a tripod because I have to get into weird spots sometimes and I just need mobility. I shoot these active portraits and family shots with just two lenses; 18-70mm 4.6 and a 80-200mm 4.6 and they work great. I usually start at about 20 feet away or so and start shooting, moving and getting into my groove and allowing the uncomfortable first minutes of a shoot disappear. As I do, I have to adjust constantly. I find that I am at about 100mm or close most of the time. But then I am at probably 60mm for the entire last half of the shoot.

    So if I had to say where I was most the time....

    60mm and 100mm about evenly.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36