Results 1 to 8 of 8

Another Photography Contest Winner Disqualified

This is a discussion on Another Photography Contest Winner Disqualified within the Photographic essays and classic photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; The evidence in this one is undeniable the image was manipulated. Does this manipulation break the contest rules? I think ...

  1. #1
    AntZ's Avatar
    AntZ is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,290
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default Another Photography Contest Winner Disqualified

    The evidence in this one is undeniable the image was manipulated. Does this manipulation break the contest rules? I think the rules are not crystal clear, but I think the manipulation shown does break them. Personally I would have no problems doing this manipulation(and regularly do) to the image to post, exhibit, sell or whatever, but to not to enter into a contest like this. Maybe this kind of manipulation may creep in to "accepted" over time. We will see.

    World Press Photo Disqualifies Winner

    Note: Scroll down the page to see the original/final images.

  2. #2
    JAS_Photo's Avatar
    JAS_Photo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    7,311
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    One little touch with the spot remover and poof gone! Seems like a lot less of a crime then the extreme crop he used which is apparently fine. I would not even consider a photo with that much of a crop to be competition worthy if it were mine.

  3. #3
    Mad Aussie's Avatar
    Mad Aussie is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Qld, Australia
    Posts
    14,098
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    Makes you wonder why it won in the first place. Did they think he created that vignetting & noise SOCC with physical filters?

  4. #4
    Greg_Nuspel's Avatar
    Greg_Nuspel is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,947
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos

    Default

    I didn't think the crop was the problem it was the removal of the foot that was the problem. Cloning out something I think does create a problem because if allowed people will push it too far. You have to draw the line somewhere and no tolerance in removal of elements of the original image I think is a good one for news photography.
    --Greg Nuspel

    I've been sucked into the void of video!!!!!!!

    Flickr

    Vimeo

  5. #5
    casil403's Avatar
    casil403 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Calgary Canada
    Posts
    6,615
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    Funny...when I saw the original image, the huge crop and the manipulation, I thought of steroid use by athletes in competition...
    I guess it's kind of similar.
    I personally thought the crop and PP was more over the top than the removal of the foot. In the original it looks like a bunch of kids getting ready to play a game. In the crop it looks like he is being bandaged from fighting or something similar. The darkness of the PP and the crop alters the entire meaning of the photo and suggests something entirely different from the original. In an art contest IMO I have no trouble but in a news/journal photo competition I do.
    And I agree with the rules...they are a bit are vague and ambiguous.
    "Life is like photography, we develop from the negatives"-anonymous
    My website: www.albertaandbeyond.com

  6. #6
    jjeling's Avatar
    jjeling is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Toledo,OH
    Posts
    1,578
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    This opinion may not count for much, but I think the crop was way too excessive, and the removal of the foot was just the icing on the cake. How many photos have we taken that we could crop that much out of the image to create a whole new image.

    My latest issue with this has to do with my own image. The one specifically of the Erie Canal. I did clone out a couple of twigs. I hate doing that. In my eyes, it is completely altering the picture. If a photographer deserves any merit, he/she needs to do everything in their power to get it right within the camera itself.

    Coming back to this image, if the original image was that of the guy getting his hand wrapped, with the rest of the annoyances out, then maybe this would not have been so scrutinized about the foot. I could be wrong though. The BW conversion and vignetting may have raised some eyebrows, but I do believe this was taken too far.

    At some point you have to draw the line. There is no doubt they have used this as an example to set a precedent for what they expect in the future. It also serves as a reminder to us all, that we should do everything we can to get it right the first time. We shouldnt ever rely PP alone to provide the image we are looking for. It can, and sometime should be used to assist in the image, but never completely relying on PP to achieve your goal.

    The problem here lies within that reason. Just way too much PP when it could have been solved with a better photograph. And a better photograph may have lost the contest to this image. That is the shame in the whole ordeal. Im not taking away from this image, it is a good one, but I think the classification of a "photograph" is gone.

    Feel free to comment on this. Im curious to hear what other might have to say as a response.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/28054853@N08/


    Photography is more than just taking a picture and freezing the action, or leaving the shutter open. It is more than orchestrating the image with the stroke of a brush. Its the realization and explanation that reality is an isolated experience in which only a specific individual can comprehend during any given time period. - Your Truly!

  7. #7
    Wicked Dark's Avatar
    Wicked Dark is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    2,262
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos

    Default

    It's still a photograph, just a highly altered one. It's a tough thing to convey in rules perhaps, the amount of alteration permitted. In this contest it appeared to be the old "I know it when I see it" approach that got this one cut. Maybe contest organizers should only accept RAW files.
    SmugMug
    Flickr
    Wicked Dark Photography Blog
    Twitter
    500px

    Apostrophes NEVER make anything plural.

  8. #8
    AcadieLibre's Avatar
    AcadieLibre is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    2,151
    My Photos
    Please do NOT edit my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    Anyone see where the rules were posted, probably right in front of me and I missed them. After I see the rules than I would have an opinion, not that it matters one way or the other lol.
    “I take photographs with love, so I try to make them art objects. But I make them for myself first and foremost - that is important.” Jacques-Henri Lartigue

    "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

    "Vive L'Acadie, Liberté, égalité, fraternité, ou la mort!"




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36