Results 1 to 3 of 3

PAINT.NET - ( free and quite good )

This is a discussion on PAINT.NET - ( free and quite good ) within the Photoshop - graphics programs - pluggins - for photography forums, part of the Education & Technical category; ...

  1. #1
    simon007 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    16
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default PAINT.NET - ( free and quite good )

    PAINT.NET

    Anyone else use it, I have and as for free open source
    Photo Editors go you can't really beat it.

    On it's own it's very decent but with the huge amount of of PLUGINS to download it's very good and you will not really need to worry about spending silly money on Adobe Photoshop 5 ( or 6 soon ). GIMP I have heard is another good free program but I don't see how it would offer more.

    Adobe Photoshop 5 £ 587.98 $ 539.49
    Corel Paint Shop Pro x4 £ 59.98 $ 43.27
    PhotoPlus X5 £ 54.26 $ 59.00
    ( Photoplus 5 has got some bad reviews on AMAZON where as Photoplus4
    is well liked and costs just under £ 20 or $ 13.94 )

    I am finding on Amazon.com ( US site ) the software works out a lot cheaper.

    So I am using Paint.NET for now but might spend a little and go for a more upmarket program.

    So everyone what do you use and WHY?

    Simon

  2. #2
    Iguanasan's Avatar
    Iguanasan is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,866
    My Photos
    Please feel free to edit my photos
    Critiques
    Critique my photos anywhere in the forum

    Default

    I use Gimp. Downloaded Paint.NET to try it out and it's pretty decent graphics editor. Layers without layer masks, however, does not seem very useful to me. 90% of the time when I am using a layer it's because I want to use a layer mask. If Paint.NET has layer masks, I can't find it. Also, with ufRAW installed in conjunction with Gimp I have RAW support for my images in a more seamless workflow.

    Both Gimp and ufRAW are free and do much more than I can use so I see no reason to spend hundreds of dollars on software that can do more than I can do. I have to rely on getting it right in camera much more often as I really suck at post production. Google's Picasa lets me manage my images for free and provides basic photo manipulation if all I need is something very simple or if I'm not concerned about perfect quality for some "snaps".
    “If you are out there shooting, things will happen for you. If you’re not out there, you’ll only hear about it.” – Jay Maisel
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Feel free to edit my shots ONLY for use on this forum and critique my shots in ANY discussion area.
    Flickr | PicasaWeb | Blog | Google+

  3. #3
    Gremlich's Avatar
    Gremlich is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    257
    My Photos
    Please ask before editing my photos
    Critiques
    Only critique photos posted in the critique forum

    Default

    GIMP is kinda clunky, though. I do not know how Paint.net is to use for comparison.
    Buying a Nikon doesn't make you a photographer. It makes you a Nikon owner. ~Author Unknown

    500px
    My Deviantart pages
    My Flickr pages
    The Rogues

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36