Doesn't the new Canon make video at 720i using all still shots but really, really fast? Or was it the new Nikon?
This is really cool by the way, thanks for sharing it.
This is a discussion on Video Made from 45,000 Photos within the General photography forums, part of the Photography & Fine art photography category; Doesn't the new Canon make video at 720i using all still shots but really, really fast? Or was it the ...
Doesn't the new Canon make video at 720i using all still shots but really, really fast? Or was it the new Nikon?
This is really cool by the way, thanks for sharing it.
Something similar you can find at Podcasts (in iTunes) made by Chase Jarvis in Chase Jarvis Photography.
It's well done..
I did something like this for birth of my son but only with a couple hundred photos mixed with sped up video..
he's turning one soon and I plan on doing the same thing for his birthday.. I have about five or six thousand photo's of him and I'm hoping to show a years growth in a few minute video.. I have many in sequential format like in this video..
good find
______________________
Nikon D300, Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200 2.8 . Nikkor 50mm 1.8 . Sigma 105mm 2.8 . Tokina 12-24 4 . SB-600 . 2xVivitar 285
I didn't care much for the "video" itself, but the concept was pretty cool. Thanks for posting![]()
I was amazed.
And look closely at the lighting used considering it all still photography. Even at 6 odd frames per second or so it's great work I reckon.
If you really want to make a small video using a still images, get the new Pentax K20D. Being a huge Pentax fan, I know specs like the back of my hand for them, but in a small .jpeg format, it will take 21 frames per second up to 115 images. Yes 21 images in one second! Thats 115 images in just over 6 second! Anyways, just thought I would share that.
Bookmarks